19.07.2017
Restraint Instead of Assertiveness: Russia and a New Era in World Politics
Reports
Want to know more about global politics?
Subsctibe to our distribution list
Alexei I. Miller

European University at Saint-Petersburg, Russia Department of History, Professor; European University at Saint-Petersburg. Russia, Center for the Study of Cultural Memory and Symbolic Politics, Academic Director

Аffiliation

ResearcherID: Z-1451-2019
Scopus AuthorID: 56321369000

Contacts

Tel.: +7 (812) 386-7634
E-mail: [email protected]
Address: European University at St. Petersburg, 6/1A Gagarinskaya Street, 191187 St. Petersburg, Russia.

Fyodor A. Lukyanov

Editor-in-Chief of Russia in Global Affairs, Chairman of the Presidium of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and Research Director of the Valdai Discussion Club. Research Professor, Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow.

Report
Download

There is one circumstance that appears to be common for Moscow and Western capitals: there is no point in referring to the events of the late 1980s and early 1990s in order to legitimize one’s actions (no matter whether they were aimed at keeping the status quo or changing it). This no longer works as a sound argument. Completely new reasons are need- ed. In this report we will try to sketch them out and understand what may happen next.

A year ago we published our first report as part of a project conceived in 2015 at the height of the conflict between Russia and the West, which had been simmering for a long time but had come to a head with the beginning of the international relations that consisted of two phases: the Cold War in the 1940s-1980s and the time of transition after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Today the world is on its way into a new paradigm.”

Subsequent events proved us right. New U.S. President Donald Trump, who sensationally won the election in November 2016, is a vivid embodiment of the end 1 of the previous era. In fact, the United States had never had such a leader before. Regardless of what he may achieve as president and how long he may stay in office, American, and therefore global, policy will no longer be the same as before the turmoil of 2016. The reason is not Trump, of course (he is no more than a symptom, a product of overdue changes), but the exhaustion of the previous political and economic model of international development.

This means new challenges for Russia, but most importantly, this forces it to reevaluate its approaches.

For twenty-five years after the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the country strived to restore (or in some instances even “take revenge”) its statehood, economy, political system and international positions. With some simplification, one can say that throughout that period Russian society and the state developed in the wake of what happened in 1991 (and the preceding triggering events). This period can be assessed differently as it combined both historically inevitable and transitory but unnecessary episodes, forced and imagined actions, heroic efforts and fatal miscalculations. Anyway, that era came to an end, mainly because it came to an end globally.

Not only Russia but also the West, and consequently world affairs in general, existed in post-Cold War mode, with Russia feeling defeated and wishing to make up for the losses, and the West engulfed in euphoria and self-admiration. Between 2008 and 2016 (from the world financial crisis to Brexit and Trump’s election), the West’s delight gradually gave way to anxiety, and eventually it became clear that things had not gone the way they were intended to go at the end of the last century, and that many things, if not all, should be started over again, taking into account new prospects.

Detachment Instead of Confrontation: Post-European Russia in Search of Self-Sufficiency
Alexei I. Miller, Fyodor A. Lukyanov
There is a great temptation today to revert to old interpretations or ideological tricks. The Cold War spirit and rhetoric are back again, which does not encourage productive discussions either between Russia and the West or inside Russia itself.
More